Clear and present danger is a term used by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in the unanimous opinion for the case Schenck v. United States , concerning the ability of the government to regulate speech against the draft during World War I:
The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that the United States Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right.Following Schenck v. United States , "clear and present danger" became both a public metaphor for First Amendment speech and a standard test in cases before the Court where a United States law limits a citizen's First Amendment rights; the law is deemed to be constitutional if it can be shown that the language it prohibits poses a "clear and present danger". However, the "clear and present danger" criterion of the Schenck decision was later modified by Brandenburg v. Ohio , and the test refined to determining whether the speech would provoke an imminent lawless action.
The vast majority of legal scholars have concluded that in writing the Schenck opinion Justice Holmes never meant to replace the "bad tendency" test which had been established in the 1868 English case R. v. Hicklin and incorporated into American jurisprudence in the 1904 Supreme Court case U.S. ex rel. Turner v. Williams . This is demonstrated by the use of the word "tendency" in Schenck itself, a paragraph in Schenck explaining that the success of speech in causing the actual harm was not a prerequisite for conviction, and use of the bad-tendency test in the simultaneous Frohwerk v. United States and Debs v. United States decisions (both of which cite Schenck without using the words "clear and present danger").
However, a subsequent essay by Zechariah Chafee entitled “Freedom of Speech in War Time” argued despite context that Holmes had intended to substitute clear and present danger for the bad-tendency standard a more protective standard of free speech. Bad tendency was a far more ambiguous standard where speech could be punished even in the absence of identifiable danger, and as such was strongly opposed by the fledgling ACLU and other libertarians of the time.
Having read Chafee's article, Holmes decided to retroactively reinterpret what he had meant by "clear and present danger" and accepted Chafee's characterization of the new test in his dissent in Abrams v. United States just six months after Schenck . Significantly unlike Abrams , the cases of Schenck , Frohwerk , and Debs had all produced unanimous decisions. Justice Brandeis soon began citing the "clear and present danger" test in his concurrences, but the new standard was not accepted by the full court until its official adoption in Brandenburg v. Ohio fifty years later.
See also
- Shouting fire in a crowded theater
- Imminent lawless action
- Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten (1917)
- Dennis v. United States
- Korematsu v. United States
References
- ^ Schenck v. United States , 249 U.S. 47 (1919) .
- ^ Derrick, Geoffrey J. (2007). "Why the Judiciary Should Protect First Amendment Political Speech During Wartime: The Case for Deliberative Democracy". Lethbridge Undergraduate Research Journal 2 (1). ISSN 17188482 . http://www.lurj.org/article.php/vol2n1/firstamend.xml .
- ^ Tsai, Robert L. (2004). "Fire, Metaphor, and Constitutional Myth-Making". Georgetown Law Journal 93 : 181–239. ISSN 00168092.
- ^ Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) .
- ^ Chafee, Zechariah (1919). "Freedom of Speech in Wartime". Harvard Law Review 32 : 932–973. doi: 10.2307/1327107 .
- ^ Abrams v. United States , 250 U.S. 616 (1919) .
Further reading
- Kessler, Mark (1993). "Legal Discourse and Political Intolerance: The Ideology of Clear and Present Danger". Law & Society Review 27 (3): 559–598. doi: 10.2307/3054105 .
- Ragan, Fred D. (1971). "Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Zechariah Chafee, Jr., and the Clear and Present Danger Test for Free Speech: The First Year, 1919". Journal of American History 58 (1): 24–45. doi: 10.2307/1890079 .
Research resources
- First Amendment Library entry on Schenck v. United States
- First Amendment Library entry on Famous First Amendment Phrases:
Movie-List - Clear And Present Danger Trailer Page
The net's largest movie trailers database. Updated daily with previews, release dates, reviews, contests, and images from new and classic films. Over 3100 downloadable movie ...
Clear and Present Danger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Clear and Present Danger is a novel by Tom Clancy, written in 1989, and is a canonical part of the Ryanverse. In the novel, Jack Ryan is thrown into the position of CIA Acting ...
Clear and Present Danger (1994)
advertisement. Overview. User Rating: 6.8/10 27,751 votes. MOVIEmeter: Up 28% in popularity this week. See why on IMDbPro. Director: Phillip Noyce. Writers (WGA):
Clear and Present Danger (film) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Clear and Present Danger is a 1994 film directed by Phillip Noyce, based on the book of the same name by Tom Clancy. It is a 1994 sequel to the 1992 film Patriot Games and was ...
Clear and Present Danger
The Obama administration is about to discover that the terrorists detained at Guantánamo are there for good reason.
Clear and Present Danger (1994) - Box Office Mojo
Clear and Present Danger summary of box office results, charts and release information and related links.
Kuensel Newspaper - Clear and present danger
There are currently, 267 guest(s) and 18 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
Amazon.com: Clear and Present Danger (Jack Ryan) (9780425122129): Tom ...
Clear and Present Danger and over 360,000 other books are available for Amazon Kindle – Amazon’s new wireless reading device. Learn more
Clear and Present Danger (1994)
CIA Analyst Jack Ryan is drawn into an illegal war fought by the US government against a Colombian drug cartel. full summary | full synopsis
Amazon.com: Clear and Present Danger: Harrison Ford, Willem Dafoe ...
Amazon.com: Clear and Present Danger: Harrison Ford, Willem Dafoe, Anne Archer, Joaquim de Almeida, Henry Czerny, Harris Yulin, Donald Moffat, Miguel Sandoval, Benjamin Bratt ...