![]()
www.ruswar.com
Propose to get this site from the blacklist:
www. global - itv.com (IPTV/ Internet TV/ Web TV Section)
Global internetTV is the leading Website for InternetTV / WEB TV and IPTV-Providers. There is no bigger free access database on the web. Belongs to the Book "Germanys most important Websites"!!! It's a direct competitor to Joost ... . We don't know why this is blocket in the US?
Propose to unblock this site on pages:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_photography
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salang_tunnel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan
- I have moved this request by 216.244.26.42 (talk • contribs • info • WHOIS) to the bottom of the list. ---J.S 18:11, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
This is true. This subject was discussed on blacklist discussion room. What is the promblem with photography? The site exists as a Collection of Afghanistan War Photography/Documentary and dos not make language difficulty for international users. There is no another site like this one can offer international users visual source of Afghanistan-Soviet war. The forementioned site can not be a spam to the due no commercial interests, advertising goods or politics. I know, there is no equel site like ruswar.com even in Ru-Net. I want you understand, I'v been on that war, I know this subject. It is not spam - it is a history, memory and notice for the people around the world. Check Ruswar.com youself - any critics will be accepted.
The problem is common human envy, then somebody does better then you. You want me to upload the whole photo/video collection under wikipedia logo and give up copyright? That's what you mean? At first, I do not promote anything, neither my website nor pictures. Promotion is - to attempt to sell or raise in position for further sale. I do charity work spending my own time and finance, because it is my obligation to the people who died on that war. Second, it is not me who abuse Wikipedia. Very few individuals, who became Wiki-Admins, begun to abuse the power which other people entrusted them. I think it is time to review qualification of wiki-admins and they ability to perform such work.
Unfortunately, my spare time is limited. I have lot's of undone things on my own website, and physicaly I am unable spend more time for studing sort of hidden policies, restrictions, web-technics, meta-codes, Java scripts and endless correspondence. Especially then people unwilling to admit own mistakes and try to look righteous at any cost. Leave it at your discretion.
If you think consensus is required, ok, do it. You know that things and how they work. You are admin here, not me. But, if you keep ignoring people opinion and block anti-terrorist site, it seems like there is a plot or conspiracy here. Otherwise you compel me to send reguest for consensus to the appropriate goverment agencies. If ruswar.com does not fit requirement for Wiki, please give strong and clear arguments, not a lame excuse. I represent people will, not my personal.
Why should I start lawsuit against Wikipedia? Nothing is wrong with Wikipedia. The thing what I talk about its report to federal investigation agency regarding your activity in certain way. What is actualy done. There is more information you may find on Wikipedia in section Patriot Act. I hope you will find lot's of useful information for youself. What makes you think before you start to speak or to do anything. You want to keep blocking anti-terrorist sites, go ahead.
The message was addressed to Mr.Eagle - the initial actor of this mess. But, I can also reply to your message as well. Who you are - it's not hard to guess. You just revealed your real face. You just said you have right to block spammers. Ok, identify spammers exactly then. Military non-profit website is spammer? Died soldiers, whom this Work devoted are spammers? War photography and documentary are spam? It is all clear with you. Of course, you have no personal website - you need to have creative mind for this. Of course, you did not served in Military Service - you need to have guts for this. The one thing you did - usurp admin keys from Wikipedia and imagine youself as a "God" and deside which website to unblock, which website to block. And you want people to beg for you as Almighty. But we are, veterans of military and all supporters turn to investigation department instead. Despite you are spaming here under nickname, I believe your real name is in federal database already. I asked people on various forums to take a close look at this correspondence and send reports as deem as nesessery. I do not need your reply, keep all your answers for the future legal questioning.
www.ainfos.ca
proposal to unblock this site on history of democracy page, or at least on the associated talk page. theres a debate going on in the talk page, as to whether theres enough scholarly material on the subject to merit a section on democratic phenomena among other animals. I tried to post a link in the talk page to the one article I found, discussing a scholarly mathematical paper. so that other editors could read for themselves. a screen came up indicating it was blocked. Not sure why this site was blacklisted in the first place. the site has a political agenda but that doesn't preclude having useful articles. Unlesss theres a specific reason, I think the whole site should be removed from blacklisting. At minimum, this particular article should be whitelisted for history of democracy, or at least its the talk page. Jvol 13:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
blog.myspace.com/firerescuelieut
I understand why MySpace links are blocked on articles as they are strictly for social networking and really do not have a place in an actual article. With that being said, I had this link on my personal information page where it was removed by one of the article reviewers. It was very relevant to my personal information page as it is a running journal of my firefighting activities. This is supposed to be a page explaining me and what I am about, and this journal is a significant part of what I am about. I would compare this to putting an external link to a band's official web site off of their Wikipedia page.
The reviewer told me to add it back in, but when I did the "Spam protection filter" kicked in, preventing me from doing so. So, here I am. If possible, can only this web page (not the entire blog.myspace.com) be "whitelisted" only for my personal page, so it is not inadvertently used on a regular article?
Firerescuelieut 02:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
www.gravinaoggi.it/pg097.html
Diocesan site of the Bishopric of Gravina and Montepeloso (see this update: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bishopric_of_Gravina_and_Montepeloso&oldid=81966610 )
unblock (ipetitions.com)
ipetitions.com because there a petition related to an article: Televsion New Zealand
oseculoprodigioso.blogspot.com , once again
This is a new request to add this site to the English Wikipedia whitelist. An admin at the global backlist declined to remove it globally and sent me back here full circle. The text below is adapted from the request I posted over there. Please consider it here seriously in the light of the additional information developed over the several discussion of the site since my first request on 9 February.
I request that this site be removed from the blacklist. If this is not the appropriate place to request a world-wide removal, please treat this as simply a request to remove the site from the blacklist of the English Wikipedia.There was an earlier discussion of the site
herein Talk:Spam_blacklist here in which other editors felt the site added value to Art articles and should not be blacklisted.I hope I have not screwed anything up by pursuing the issue for a time over in Whitelist Talk instead of here because I didn't really understand the relationship between the two lists.Now I am backherebased on a suggestion made in Talk:Spam-whitelist, where there has been a separate discussion of the site here. Taken together, the two discussions are rather lengthy, but to summarize, from my viewpoint:
- An over-enthuiastic site owner added links to his collection of fine art images, by artist, to several art articles (not sure how many, but maybe 20 or 30 in the English Wikipedia)
- These were correctly identified as spam because of the way they were added
- However, the site houses a broad and rich collection of artwork images for famous and respected artists, with many works that are unfamiliar (at least to me)
- The links add value to Wikipedia by greatly extending the number of available examples of each linked artist's work
- The site has no ads and is not selling anything
- Several legitimate editors support de-blacklisting the site.
I have absolutely no affiliation with this site or its owner, I am just an admirer of the collection. Thank you for considering this request. --CliffC 20:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Endorse this I think I commented in a previous discussion here. Images are good, site is not commercial. I've never added it myself, but have found it on several articles in en (many now have taken it off). 87.194.23.18 18:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC) (Johnbod from en)
Please cons
Term Life Insurance for Smokers from AIG
Smokers and Tobacco users, get affordable rates on term life insurance. Request a term life insurance quote online and give your family the financial safeguard they deserve.
Cheapest Life Insurance Plans for all types of policies
Cheaper Insurance - 10 Year - 20 Year - 30 Year - Guaranteed - Affordable Rates - No ... Smoker?: Yes No: Your Health ... cost group rates. Many employers offer free life insurance to their ...
Smart Life Insurance Rate Quote Insights | Life Insurance For Smokers ...
If you happen to be a smoker and are looking for affordable life insurance, you may soon realize that high life insurance rates are ...
Information for Smokers on Affordable Life Insurance Rates
Specializing in smoker term life insurance rate information, underwriting guidelines, and life insurance company classes.
Life Insurance Quotes | Term Life Insurance Rates | Compare Term ...
Compare Term Life Insurance rates among America's most trusted insurers. Fast. Easy. Secure.
Term Life Insurance for smokers - Tobacco smoker level term quotes and ...
Getting life insurance if you use tobacco products. Get the best possible rates if you are a smoker. ... 10-year level term policy is the most affordable ...
Advantage Life Insurance Quotes Cheap rates online
Advantage term life - Get a lower rate policy for all types of insurance. ... We provide the best competitive affordable term rates ... Smoker?: Yes No: Your Health: Regular ...
View Document — BTCenter Portal
... Life Insurance Rates, Municipal Employee Life Insurance, Commonwealth Life Insurance Company Louisville, Buy Life Insurance In Costa Rica, Affordable Insurance Life Smoker Term,
Affordable Insurance - Life
How To Get Affordable Insurance for yourself and family. Many kind of insurance such as Life insurance, Health ... the other hand, a very heavy smoker ... tool for getting low rates. Use it ...
Non Smoker Life Insurance Rates | Non Smoker Life Insurance Quotes
Non Smoker Life Insurance Rates - Compare Non Smoker Life Insurance Quotes Online or Buy No ... Term life insurance is the most affordable way to protect your family’s future.