An offshore financial centre (or OFC ), although not precisely defined, is usually a low-tax, lightly regulated jurisdiction which specializes in providing the corporate and commercial infrastructure to facilitate the use of that jurisdiction for the formation of offshore companies and for the investment of offshore funds.
The term offshore financial centre is a relatively modern neologism, first coined in the 1980s. Although the terms are not synonymous, many leading offshore finance centres are regarded as "tax havens", and the lack of precise definitions often leads to confusion between the concepts. In Tolley's International Initiatives Affecting Financial Havens the author in the Glossary of Terms defines an "offshore financial centre" in forthright terms as "a politically correct term for what used to be called a tax haven." However, he then qualifies this by adding "The use of this term makes the important point that a jurisdiction may provide specific facilities for offshore financial centres without being in any general sense a tax haven."
Definitions
Offshore financial centres are often (but not always) current or former British Colonies or Crown Dependencies, and often refer to themselves simply as offshore jurisdictions .
The term is fluid to a certain extent, and it has been remarked more than once that whether a financial centre is characterized as "offshore" is really a question of degree.
The IMF considers the following to be characteristics of an offshore financial centre:
- Jurisdictions that have relatively large numbers of financial institutions engaged primarily in business with non-residents;
- Financial systems with external assets and liabilities out of proportion to domestic financial intermediation designed to finance domestic economies; and
- Centres which provide some or all of the following services: low or zero taxation; moderate or light financial regulation; banking secrecy and anonymity.
Views of offshore financial centres tend to be polarised. Proponents suggest that reputable offshore financial centres play a legitimate and integral role in international finance and trade, offering huge advantages in certain situations for both corporations and individuals, allowing legitimate risk management and financial planning.
Critics argue that they drain tax from wealthy (and not so wealthy) nations, are insufficiently regulated, and facilitate illegal activities such as tax evasion and money laundering while avoiding legal risk under corporate veil.
Proponents point to the tacit support of offshore centres by the governments of the United States (who promote offshore financial centres by the continuing use of the FSC) and United Kingdom (who actively promote offshore finance in Caribbean dependent territories to help them diversify their economies and to facilitate the British Eurobond market).
OPIC, a U.S. government agency, when lending into countries with underdeveloped corporate law, often requires the borrower to form an offshore vehicle to facilitate the loan financing. One could argue that US external aid statutorily cannot even take place without the formation of offshore entities.
What is certainly true of offshore financial centres is that recently they have attracted a great deal more attention than in the past, and international initiatives spearheaded by the OECD, the FATF and the IMF have had a significant effect on the offshore finance industry. A number of smaller, less regulated jurisdictions figuratively went to the wall, and closed up shop. Most of the principle offshore centres that remained considerably strengthened their internal regulations relating to money laundering and other key regulated activities. On 23 February 2007 The Economist published a survey of offshore financial centres; although the magazine had historically been very hostile towards OFCs, the report represented a shift towards a very much more benign view of the role of offshore finance, concluding: "...although international initiatives aimed at reducing financial crime are welcome, the broader concern over OFCs is overblown. Well-run jurisdictions of all sorts, whether nominally on- or offshore, are good for the global financial system."
Taxation
Although most offshore financial centres originally rose to prominence by facilitating structures which helped to minimise exposure to tax, tax avoidance has played a decreasing role in the success of offshore financial centres in recent years. Although most offshore financial centres still charge little or no tax, the increasing sophistication of onshore tax codes has meant that there is often little tax benefit relative to the cost of moving a transaction structure offshore.
Most professional practitioners in offshore jurisdictions refer to themselves as being "tax neutral", referring to the fact that, whatever tax burdens the proposed transaction or structure will have in its primary operating jurisdiction or market, having the structure based in an offshore jurisdiction will not create any additional tax burdens.
For example, international joint ventures are often structured as companies in an offshore jurisdiction when neither joint venture party wishes to form the company in the other party's home jurisdiction, but both parties wish to ensure that the company's jurisdiction of incorporation will not attract unwanted tax consequences.
Many offshore financial centres used to "ring fence" offshore companies formed in those jurisdictions (International Business Companies formed in the British Virgin Islands were a good example).
However, recent international pressure has brought an end to ring-fencing in most jurisdictions, and most offshore financial centres simply restructured their tax codes so that the activity of the offshore companies, whilst technically subject to tax in the jurisdiction, was never likely to result in tax being assessed.
Critics of offshore financial centres argue that a lack of transparency in offshore financial centres means that they are vulnerable to being used in illegal tax evasion schemes. A number of international organizations also suggest that offshore financial centres engage in "unfair tax competition" by having no, or very low tax burdens, and have argued that such jurisdictions should be forced to tax both economic activity and their own citizens at a higher level.
Another criticism leveled against offshore financial centres is that whilst sophisticated jurisdictions usually have developed tax codes which prevent tax revenues leaking from the use of offshore jurisdictions, less developed nations, who can least afford to lose tax revenue, are unable to keep pace with the rapid development of the use of offshore financial structures.
Regulation
Most offshore financial centres now promote themselves on the basis of "light but effective" regulation, and generally only seek to regulate high-risk financial business, such as banking, insurance and mutual funds. An extremely high proportion of hedge funds (which characteristically employ high risk investment strategies) who register offshore are presumed to be driven by lighter regulatory requirements rather than perceived tax benefits.
Many capital markets bond issues are also structured through a special purpose vehicle incorporated in an offshore financial centre specifically to minimise the amount of regulatory red-tape associated with the issue. Some offshore jurisdictions have sought to replicate this success with equity issues by forming local stock exchanges, but these have not been a notable success to date.
A number of internet-based businesses have recently set up business in offshore financial centres which, whilst lawful in the offshore financial centre, would not be lawful in its target market. These businesses often relate to pornography or gambling.
Critics of offshore financial centres suggest that they are not effectively regulated in all areas, and in particular that they are vulnerable to being used by organised crime for money laundering. However, partly in response to international initiatives and partly in a defensive move to protect their reputations, most offshore financial centres now apply fairly rigorous anti-money laundering regulations to offshore business. Some even argue that offshore jurisdictions are in many cases better regulated than many onshore financial centres. For example, in most offshore jurisdictions, a person needs a licence to act as a trustee, whereas (for example) in the United Kingdom and the United States, there are no restrictions or regulations as to who may serve in a fiduciary capacity.
Some commentators have expressed concern that the differing levels of sophistication between offshore financial centres will lead to "regulatory arbitrage", and fuel a race to the bottom, although evidence from the market seems to indicate the investors prefer to utilise better regulated offshore jurisdictions rather than more poorly regulated ones.
Confidentiality
See also: ConfidentialityCritics of offshore jurisdictions point to excessive secrecy in those jurisdictions, particularly in relation to the beneficial ownership of offshore companies, and in relation to offshore bank accounts.
The criticisms are slightly difficult to assess. In most jurisdictions banks will preserve the confidentiality of their customers, and all of the major off
Smart New Magazine Vision Blends Offshore Business and Pleasure ...
Smart New Magazine Vision Blends Offshore Business and Pleasure from Business Wire provided by Find Articles at BNET
Offshore Business Magazine - Free offshore business magazine
The Offshore Business Magazine is the fastest growing financial and professional magazine for the offshore world and its clients. Our mission is to keep investors, entrepreneurs ...
Offshore Europe - Atlantic Business Magazine
The international exploration and production event for the global oil and gas industry incorporating a free SPE technical conference, over 1400 exhibiting companies, associated ...
Offshore Business Processing | Banking Technology magazine ...
How to benefit from a new source of value, by Amir Roy , MA Partners
Cayman Net News: Internet magazine focuses on offshore sector
Internet magazine focuses on offshore sector. John Enar Karlsson, Editor in Chief. Monday, January 30, 2006. Given that broadband Internet access is common in financial sectors ...
Compare Offshore Business Magazine Magazine Reviews with Great ...
Compare Offshore Business Magazine Magazine Reviews with Great Magazine Reviews, Find Offshore Business Magazine Magazine in Business Magazines at Review Centre
Offshore Software Development Forum UK - ISSUE #06 OF "OFFSHORE ...
Offshore Business Magazine (www.magverlag.com) is one of the largest and fastest growing free digital magazines for the offshore world. Reaching an audience of more than 10 000 ...
Offshore Business News, Stories, Job Vacancies, Tips and Articles ...
The Offshore Business Magazine is the fastest growing financial and professional magazine for the offshore world and its clients. Our mission is to keep investors, entrepreneurs ...
Offshore Software Development Forum UK - Issue 7 of Offshore Business ...
The fastest growing financial and professional magazine for the offshore world has now launched its seventh free issue - get your FREE copy at magverlag.com.
Offshore Business Magazine - new FREE magazine..
ISSUE #03 of the Offshore Business Magazine has been launched. The fastest growing financial and professional magazine for the offshore financial